🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.