🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative said: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.